Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAGHUNATHAN versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


RAGHUNATHAN v. STATE OF KERALA - Crl MC No. 3963 of 2006 [2006] RD-KL 2453 (4 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 3963 of 2006()

1. RAGHUNATHAN,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

For Petitioner :SRI.P.HARIDAS

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :04/12/2006

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J

Crl.M.C.No.3963 of 2006

Dated this the 4th day of December 2006

O R D E R

The petitioner is the second accused in a prosecution initiated interalia under Section 3(1)(X) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Attrocities) Act 1989.

2. The investigation is now complete. Final report has already been filed. Cognizance has been taken by the learned Magistrate. The proceedings have been registered as committal proceedings 5/02. The petitioner was not arrested in the course of investigation. The petitioner wants to appear before the learned Magistrate. He is willing to co-operate and take part in the further proceedings. He has come to this court with the prayer that he may be directed to be released on bail when he appears before the learned Magistrate and applies for bail. The anxiety is understandable as the offence is triable exclusively by a court of Sessions. The petitioner apprehends that the learned Magistrate may not grant him bail.

3. It is certainly for the petitioner to appear before the learned Magistrate and seek bail in the regular and ordinary course. I find no reason to assume that the learned Magistrate would not consider the application for bail on merits, in accordance with law and Crl.M.C.No.3963/06 2 expeditiously. It has been repeatedly held that notwithstanding the fact that the offence is triable exclusively by a court of Sessions, the learned Magistrate can consider the application for bail. In the following decisions, the said principles has been reiterated - Shanu v. State of Kerala [2000(3)KLT 452], Ali v. State of Kerala [2000(2)KLT 280], Krishnakumar v. State of Kerala [2005(1) KLD(Cri)42] and P.P.Kader v. State of Kerala [2005(1)KLD(Cri)250]. The court must consider the same in the light of the principles enuntiated in the above decisions. 4, In the result, this Crl.M.C is allowed in part. It is directed that if the petitioner appears before the learned Magistrate and applies for bail, the learned Magistrate must proceed to pass appropriate orders on merits, in accordance with law, in the light of the dictum in the above decisions and expeditiously - on the date of surrender itself, unless compelling and exceptional reasons are there.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

jsr Crl.M.C.No.3963/06 3 Crl.M.C.No.3963/06 4

R.BASANT, J

C.R.R.P.No.

ORDER

21ST DAY OF JULY 2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.