Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ABRAHAM @ KUTTAN versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


ABRAHAM @ KUTTAN v. STATE OF KERALA - Crl Rev Pet No. 4348 of 2006 [2006] RD-KL 2742 (7 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl Rev Pet No. 4348 of 2006()

1. ABRAHAM @ KUTTAN,
... Petitioner

2. WILSON VARGHESE,

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.MVS.NAMBOOTHIRY

For Respondent :SRI.S.SANTOSH KUMAR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

Dated :07/12/2006

O R D E R

K.T. SANKARAN, J.

CRL.R.P.NO. 4348 OF 2006

Dated this the 7th day of December,2006

O R D E R

The petitioners were found guilty by the trial court for the offences under Sections 326 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code. On appeal by the accused, the Appellate Court set aside the conviction under Section 326 and confirmed the conviction under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Crl.M.A.No.12588 of 2006, filed by Pws.1 to 4 who are the injured persons as well as the revision petitioners for grant of leave to compound the offence was allowed. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Petition is allowed. The conviction and sentence imposed on the petitioners are set aside and the petitioners CRL.R.P.NO.4348 OF 2006 are acquitted under Section 320(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge

K.T. SANKARAN, J.

CRL.M.A.NO. 12588 OF 2006

Dated this the 7th day of December,2006

O R D E R

This application is filed under Section 320(6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for granting leave to compound the offence under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code. The application is signed by Pws.1 to 4 who are the injured persons as well as by the revision petitioners/accused.

2. The trial court convicted and sentenced the petitioners for the offences under Sections 326 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code. On appeal by them, the conviction under Section 326 was set aside and the conviction under Section 324 was confirmed.

3. A perusal of the judgments would indicate that the injured as well as the revision petitioners belonged to different political parties CRL.R.P.NO.4348 OF 2006 and dispute arose in respect of an election. Now the matter has been settled between the partites. In the facts and circumstances of the case, leave is granted to compound the offence. Accordingly, the application is allowed. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.