Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KADEEJAMMA KOYAKKUTY, W/O. LATE versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


KADEEJAMMA KOYAKKUTY, W/O. LATE v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - WP(C) No. 23245 of 2003(P) [2006] RD-KL 2792 (7 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 23245 of 2003(P)

1. KADEEJAMMA KOYAKKUTY, W/O. LATE
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

2. TAHASILDAR, KANAYANNUR TALUK,

3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKUALM DISTRICT,

4. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,

For Petitioner :SRI.P.A.ABDUL JABBAR

For Respondent :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH

Dated :07/12/2006

O R D E R

KURIAN JOSEPH, J.

W.P(C)No.23245 of 2003

Dated this the 7th day of December, 2006



JUDGMENT

The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:-

a) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ, order or direction calling for the records relating to Ext.P1, P4 and P14 relating to LA No.194/85 and quash the same as illegal.

b) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction directing the 2nd respondent to issue order granting registry on the petitioner assigning the 10 cents of land comprised in Sy.No.197/1 of Kakkanad village (Old Sy.No.324/1 of Thrikkakara South Village). In view of Ext.P5 notification dated 22-7-1997 and Ext.P7 assignment list published thereafter and in view of Ext.P14 report of the Tahsildar himself and still further in view of Exts.P16 to P21 tax receipts, petitioner is entitled to get assignment. There is no counter affidavit. There will be a direction to the second respondent to consider the matter afresh with notice to the petitioner ignoring Ext.P4 and pass appropriate orders in the matter within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above.

(KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE)

ahg.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.