Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SAJIKUMAR, S/O.LATE GANGADHARAN versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SAJIKUMAR, S/O.LATE GANGADHARAN v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - Crl Rev Pet No. 4344 of 2006 [2006] RD-KL 2847 (7 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl Rev Pet No. 4344 of 2006()

1. SAJIKUMAR, S/O.LATE GANGADHARAN,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

2. CUSTOMER KURIES PRIVATE LIMITED,

For Petitioner :SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN

For Respondent :SRI.P.S.VIJAYAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

Dated :07/12/2006

O R D E R

K.T. SANKARAN, J.

Crl.R.P.NO. 4344 OF 2006

Dated this the 7th day of December,2006

O R D E R

The petitioner was convicted for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and the trial court imposed a sentence of simple imprisonment for fifteen days. The accused was also directed to pay a sum of Rs.19,487.50 as compensation under Section 357(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. On appeal by the accused, the Appellate Court confirmed the conviction and sentence and dismissed the appeal.

2. Crl.M.A. No.12577 of 2006, signed by the complainant and the accused and their counsel, filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was allowed. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Petition is CRL.R.P.NO.4344 OF 2006 allowed, the conviction and sentence imposed on the petitioner are set aside and the petitioner is acquitted under Section 320(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/

K.T. SANKARAN, J.

Crl.M.A.NO. 12577 OF 2006

Dated this the 7th day of December,2006

O R D E R

This is an application under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, seeking to compound the offence under Section 138 of the Act. The application is signed by the revision petitioner/accused and the second respondent/ complainant. It is stated that the matter is settled between the parties. Hence the application is allowed. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.