Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

JANARDHANAN versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


JANARDHANAN v. STATE OF KERALA - Bail Appl No. 4205 of 2006 [2006] RD-KL 288 (19 July 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 4205 of 2006()

1. JANARDHANAN, S/O.KUNJUCHERUKKAN,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

For Petitioner :SRI.C.S.MANILAL

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice J.M.JAMES

Dated :19/07/2006

O R D E R

J.M.JAMES, J.

B.A.4205/2006

DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JULY, 2006

O R D E R

The petitioner submits that he is innocent. He is not involved in any Abkari offence at all. The statement, made by the investigating officer of Konni Police Station in crime No.133/2006, as submitted by the prosecution, is not correct, submits the counsel. The learned Public Prosecutor is not able to give other details of the involvement of the petitioner, except that at the time of the seizure of ten liters of arrack, on 15.5.2006, the petitioner, accused, in this case, had run away. Therefore, Konni police registered the crime, under Section 8(1) and 8(2) of the Abkari Act. The petitioner is before this Court, under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2. In the above facts situation, I direct the petitioner to surrender before the investigating officer of Konni Police Station, on 26.7.2006 between 10.30 and 11.00 a.m. The investigating officer shall interrogate the B.A.4205/2006 2 petitioner and produce him thereafter, before the competent Magistrate Court, as per the law. On production, the petitioner may move an application for bail, and if there is no other case registered or brought to the notice of the Court, under the provisions of the Abkari Act, the learned Magistrate shall release him on bail. In case of any other case is also registered, the learned Magistrate shall pass orders, according to the law, considering Section 41A of the Abkari Act. The application is disposed of as above. J.M.JAMES

JUDGE

mrcs


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.