Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ANITHA KOMALA NAIR versus STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


ANITHA KOMALA NAIR v. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE - Tr P(Crl) No. 100 of 2006 [2006] RD-KL 2885 (8 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Tr P(Crl) No. 100 of 2006()

1. ANITHA KOMALA NAIR,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE
... Respondent

2. P. THANKKAPPAN PILLAI,

3. MEENAKSHI AMMA, PADINJARE PUTHEN

4. M. SATHI DEVI, W/O.B. GOPAKUMAR,

For Petitioner :SRI.SASTHAMANGALAM S. AJITHKUMAR

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :08/12/2006

O R D E R

R. BASANT, J.

Tr.P.(Cri).NO. 100 OF 2006

Dated this the 8th day of December, 2006

ORDER

The petitioner, whose identical application for transfer has been dismissed by this Court as per order dated 28/6/06 in Tr.P.(Cri) No.2/06, has again come to this Court repeating the same prayer. The petitioner is the de facto complainant/wife who has made allegation against her husband and relatives of their having committed the offence punishable under Sec.498A of the IPC. Before the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Ambalapuzha, Annexure-C - C.C.No.252/02 is pending and the accused there are the relatives of the husband. The husband is not an accused in that case. Another Bench of this Court, after detailed consideration, came to the conclusion that the prayer for transfer is without any merit. Subject of course to appropriate directions to allay the apprehension of the petitioner, that petition for transfer was dismissed as per order dated 28/6/06.

2. The petitioner has now come to this Court again with a renewed request for the same transfer on the ground that Tr.P.(Cri).NO. 100 OF 2006 -: 2 :- the prosecution initiated by her against the husband has been charge sheeted and is pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvananthapuram. The petitioner now prays that the case at Ambalapuzha may be transferred to the court at Thiruvananthapuram.

3. I find absolutely no justification in the prayer, similar prayer having already been rejected by this Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner then submits that the case pending before the Thiruvananthapuram court may be transferred to the Ambalapuza court. But admittedly the accused in the case now pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvananthapuram, has not entered appearance. I am satisfied that there are absolutely no reasons which would justify the prayer for transfer now.

4. This Crl.M.C. is, in these circumstances, dismissed. The learned Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Ambalapuza must make every attempt to dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible.

5. The Registry shall communicate this order to both courts. Sd/-

(R. BASANT, JUDGE)

Nan/ //true copy// P.S. To Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.