Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DR.R.GOPINATHAN versus THE CHANCELLOOR

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


DR.R.GOPINATHAN v. THE CHANCELLOOR - OP No. 8470 of 2002(G) [2006] RD-KL 2905 (8 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

OP No. 8470 of 2002(G)

1. DR.R.GOPINATHAN
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE CHANCELLOOR,
... Respondent

2. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS

3. THE KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY

For Petitioner :SRI.K.SUDHAKARAN

For Respondent :SRI.N.D.PREMACHANDRAN, SC, AGRL.UNTY.

The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH

Dated :08/12/2006

O R D E R

KURIAN JOSEPH, J.

O.P.No.8470 of 2002 Dated 8th December, 2006.

J U D G M E N T

The writ petition is filed mainly with the following prayers :-

(i) "To issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, direction or order declaring Exts.P3 and P2 as illegal and unconstitutional. (ii) To issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, direction or order commanding respondents to take steps to see that the petitioner is serving as Pro-Vice Chancellor of the Kerala Agricultural University till his term expires under Ext.P1. (iii) To issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the respondents to pay the remuneration and all other allowances etc. to the petitioner considering that the petitioner had continued in service as per the terms of Ext.P1." Though the learned counsel for the petitioner made vehement submission that the termination itself was politically motivated, in view of the efflux of time of tenure also, as far as the claim for salary and other benefits are concerned, the petitioner has to approach the civil court. Hence the writ petition is disposed of making it clear that in the event of the petitioner approaching the civil court, the time taken for prosecuting this writ petition shall stand excluded in computing the period of limitation.

KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE.

tgs

KURIAN JOSEPH, J

O.P.No.8470 of 2002 (G)

J U D G M E N T

Dated 8th December, 2006.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.