Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

P.M. EMMANUEL versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


P.M. EMMANUEL v. STATE OF KERALA - Bail Appl No. 4124 of 2006 [2006] RD-KL 295 (19 July 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 4124 of 2006()

1. P.M.EMMANUEL,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

For Petitioner :SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice J.M.JAMES

Dated :19/07/2006

O R D E R

J.M.JAMES, J.

B.A.4124/2006

DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JULY, 2006

O R D E R

The petitioner is the accused, in crime No. 372/2006 of Pala Police Station. The offence alleged against him and others are under Sections 120B, 406, 408, 409, 420, 465, 468 and 477 IPC read with Section 34 IPC. The learned Public prosecutor submits that the accused had misproportionated fifty one lakhs of rupees and therefore, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required. Therefore, he opposes the prayer for an order, under Section 438 Cr.P.C., which is being sought for by the petitioner, through this application.

2. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public prosecutor, I direct the petitioner, second accused, to surrender before the investigating officer of Pala Police Station, on 25.7.2006 between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. If the investigating officer intends to have the petitioner for further B.A.4124/2006 2 interrogation, he is at liberty to move an application before the Court below, as per the law, and get the custody of the petitioner, to complete the investigation and for the recovery of any material that is required, with the permission of the Court. If an application, to that effect, is moved by the investigating officer before the Court below, the learned Magistrate shall hear both sides and pass appropriate orders. On completion of the investigation, if an application is filed by the petitioner for bail, the same shall also be considered, as per the law. The application is disposed of as above. J.M.JAMES

JUDGE

mrcs


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.