Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

S.NAYAGAM, S/O.SELVARAJ MOORTHI versus MUNNAR GRAMA PANCHAYATH (SPECIAL GRADE)

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


S.NAYAGAM, S/O.SELVARAJ MOORTHI v. MUNNAR GRAMA PANCHAYATH (SPECIAL GRADE) - WP(C) No. 30666 of 2006(A) [2006] RD-KL 2982 (8 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 30666 of 2006(A)

1. S.NAYAGAM, S/O.SELVARAJ MOORTHI,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. MUNNAR GRAMA PANCHAYATH (SPECIAL GRADE),
... Respondent

2. THE TAHSILDAR, DEVIKULAM TALUK,

3. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE CHIEF

For Petitioner :SRI.N.M.VARGHESE

For Respondent :SMT.AYSHA YOUSEFF, SC, MUNNAR G.PANCHAY

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE

Dated :08/12/2006

O R D E R

PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,J.

``````````````````````````` W.P.(C) NO. 30666 OF 2006 ```````````````````````````

Dated this the 8th day of December, 2006



J U D G M E N T

Heard Sri.N.M.Varghese, counsel for the petitioner and Smt.Aysha Yousuf, standing counsel for the 1st respondent Panchayat. Counsel for the petitioner submits that what the petitioner wants, is only to do the essentially needed repairs to the basement and foundation of the building which is seen in Exhibit P7 photograph. Counsel undertook that the petitioner will not expand the plinth area of the building in any manner at all. The learned standing counsel for the Panchayat submitted that it should be ensured that the petitioner does not expand plinth area of the building under the guise of the permit to be issued in his favour by the Panchayat.

2. Under these circumstances, the writ petition will stand disposed of with the following directions. The Secretary of the 1st respondent, Panchayat will immediately take up Exhibit P10, consider it favourably and issue permit to the petitioner for doing all the necessary repair and reinforcement works retaining the basement and foundation of WPC 30666/2006 existing shop cum residential building which is seen in Exhibit P7 photograph. The permit as directed above will be issued by the respondent within two weeks of the respondent receiving copy of this judgment. The permit shall contain a clause that the petitioner shall not expand the plinth area of the building in question at all, and that the foundation and basement will only be repaired and reinforced.

PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE

Rp


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.