Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

C.P.KUNHUNNI versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


C.P.KUNHUNNI v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - WP(C) No. 24505 of 2006(P) [2006] RD-KL 3026 (11 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 24505 of 2006(P)

1. C.P.KUNHUNNI,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN

For Respondent :SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH

Dated :11/12/2006

O R D E R

K.M.JOSEPH, J.

W.P.(C).No. 24505 OF 2006

Dated this the 11th day of December,2006.



JUDGMENT

Complaint of the petitioner is directed against Ext.P4. Petitioner had approached this court earlier culminating in Ext.P3 judgment. In Ext.P3 judgment this court directed as follows:

" EXt.P6 Government Order in W.P.C.No.9002/05 is approved. The Government will pass separate orders regarding the regularisation of the period during which Mr.Kunjunni was kept out of service after hearing Mr.Kunjunni, the manager, Mr.Lal as well as the concerned departmental authorities".

2. One of the complaints raised by the petitioner against Ext.P4 is that he was not heard contrary to the direction of this court. Of course, petitioner has other contentions also. It would appear from Ext.P4 that petitioner was not heard .

3. In such circumstances, I feel that Ext.P4 cannot be sustained. Accordingly, Ext.P4 is quashed for the only reason that petitioner was not heard. I leave open all the other contentions of the petitioner. The first respondent will hear the petitioner, supplemental respondents 2 and 3 and the concerned departmental authorities as directed in Ext.P3 and take a decision in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. K.M.JOSEPH.

JUDGE.

sv.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.