Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

K.CHIDAMBARA, AGED 51 YEARS versus THE MEDICAL OFFICER, PRIMARY HEALTH

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


K.CHIDAMBARA, AGED 51 YEARS v. THE MEDICAL OFFICER, PRIMARY HEALTH - OP No. 10020 of 2003(P) [2006] RD-KL 3049 (11 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

OP No. 10020 of 2003(P)

1. K.CHIDAMBARA, AGED 51 YEARS,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE MEDICAL OFFICER, PRIMARY HEALTH
... Respondent

2. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER,

For Petitioner :SRI.U.P.KUNIKULLAYA

For Respondent :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH

Dated :11/12/2006

O R D E R

KURIAN JOSEPH, J.

O.P. NO. 10020 OF 2003

Dated this the 11th day of December, 2006



J U D G M E N T

The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:-

"(b) To issue a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing Ext.P12 order and restoring Ext.P8 order with direction to the respondents or such of them who are responsible for payment of the salary to the petitioner from July 2002 onwards at the rate refixed as per Ext.P8 order along with interest thereon from the respective dates.

(c) To grant interim orders for necessary direction of the respondents or such of them who are responsible to pay the salary to the petitioner at the rate refixed as per Ext.P8 order till the disposal of the O.P."

2. Learned Government Pleader submits that no relevance can be placed on Ext.P8 since it is a fabricated document. However, it is submitted that the petitioner had made a re-option during the pendency of the writ petition in the year 2005, and hence if at all the petitioner has any surviving grievance, liberty may be reserved to him to approach the Government. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of making it clear that in case the petitioner has any surviving grievance, it will be open to him to approach the Government. It is made clear that, in that view of the matter I have not considered the writ petition on merits and the entire contentions are left open.

KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE

vps

KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE

OP NO.10020/03

JUDGMENT

11th DECEMBER, 2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.