M.P.KURIAKOSE,TRADE INSTRUCTOR GRADE II versus STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY

High Court of Kerala

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

M.P.KURIAKOSE,TRADE INSTRUCTOR GRADE II v. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY - OP No. 13769 of 2002(L) [2006] RD-KL 3073 (11 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

OP No. 13769 of 2002(L)

1. M.P.KURIAKOSE,TRADE INSTRUCTOR GRADE II,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY
... Respondent

2. THE DIRECTOFR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION,

3. MAR ATHANESIUS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

For Petitioner :SRI.K.JAJU BABU

For Respondent :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH

Dated :11/12/2006

O R D E R

KURIAN JOSEPH, J.

O.P. NO. 13769 OF 2002

Dated this the 11th day of December, 2006

J U D G M E N T

The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:-

"(i) To issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to sanction two posts of Instructor Gr.II and one post of Draftsman Grade I in the Civil Engineering Department of the 3rd respondent as requested and recommended by Exts. P1 to P3 forthwith. (ii) To declare that Ext.P5 is not in confirmity with the direction given by this Hon'ble Court in Ext.P4 judgment and quash the same by issuing a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ, order or direction." 2 Going by the counter affidavit, the stand taken by the Director as observed from Para.7 onwards is that the issue is to be considered afresh by the Government since according to the Director, the strength of Inspector Gr.I and Gr.II has to be increased in view of the sanctioning of additional post of Lecturers. It is seen that there is Ex.P3 recommendation by the Director of Technical Education to the Government. In Ext.P4 judgment this Court directed the Government to fix the staff pattern of private Engineering Colleges. Ext.P5 is the order in the matter. There is no reference to Ext.P3 recommendation made by the Director. In the  OP NO.13769/02 Page numbers meanwhile, the Director of Technical Education has issued staff fixation in the case of private Arts and Science Colleges as per Ext.P7. According to the petitioner, there has to be a similar staff fixation in the case of private Engineering Colleges also. Since Ext.P7 is a subsequent development and since there is no reference to Ext.P3, it is only appropriate that the petitioner approaches the Government for reconsideration of Ext.P5. The writ petition is hence disposed of as follows: In the event of either the petitioner or the 3rd respondent moving the Government in view of the submissions noted in this judgment as above, the matter will be duly considered by the Government, with notice to the petitioner and the 3rd respondent and appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law in the matter will be passed adverting to the contentions taken by the petitioner/3rd respondent, within another four months.

KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE

vps  OP NO.13769/02 Page numbers

KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE

OP NO.13769/02

JUDGMENT

11th DECEMBER, 2006 

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.