Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RADHIKA K., D/O. GOPALAN NAMBIAR versus STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


RADHIKA K., D/O. GOPALAN NAMBIAR v. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY - Bail Appl No. 7300 of 2006 [2006] RD-KL 3109 (11 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 7300 of 2006()

1. RADHIKA K., D/O. GOPALAN NAMBIAR,
... Petitioner

2. SATHI A. BABU, W/O. ARAVIND BABU,

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY
... Respondent

2. STATION HOUSE OFFICER,

For Petitioner :SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :11/12/2006

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

B.A. NO. 7300 of 2006

Dated: 11th December 2006

O R D E R

Petitioners who are accused Nos. 2 and 3 in Crime No. 503 of 2006 of Hosdurg Police Station for offences punishable under Secs. 342, 354, 506(1) and 376 read with Sec. 109 I.P.C. seek their enlargement on bail.

2. Even though the learned Director General of Prosecutions opposed the application, having regard to the fact that both the petitioners are ladies and appropriate conditions can be imposed to safeguard the interest of the prosecution as well, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on each of them executing a bond for Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the J.F.C.M-I, Hosdurg, and subject to the following conditions:

1. The petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

2. The petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to tamper with the evidence of the prosecution. B.A. NO. 7300 of 2006 -:2:-

3. The Petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail. If the petitioners commit breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to them shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above.

V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.