Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAMACHANDRAN versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


RAMACHANDRAN v. STATE OF KERALA - Bail Appl No. 7099 of 2006 [2006] RD-KL 3239 (12 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 7099 of 2006()

1. RAMACHANDRAN,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.SUNNY MATHEW

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :12/12/2006

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Bail Application No. 7099 of 2006 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Dated, this the 13th day of December 2006

ORDER

The petitioner who is the first accused in Crime No. 228/2006 of Feroke Police Station for an offence punishable under Sec. 420 read with Sec. 34 I.P.C. seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. He made available to me the case diary files relating to the matter.

3. Some time in May 2006 accused Nos. 1 and 2 promising the de facto complainant who is a lady belonging to the Schedule Caste to help her to secure a housing loan from the Kudumbasree induced her to part with her title deed in respect of her residential building and appurtenant land costing Rs. 5,00,000/-. They also secured her signature in a blank stamp paper. After converting the said stamp paper into an agreement for sale, the petitioner has instituted a suit for specific performance alleging that the de facto complainant had agreed to sell her property to him.

4. Investigation of the case is still in the preliminary stage. It is too early to conclude that the petitioner is not guilty of the offence alleged and that the de facto complainant was willingly executing the B.A. No. 7099/06 -:2:- agreement for sale in favour of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the Magistrate concerned and files an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of, preferably, on the same date on which it is filed. With the above observation, this application is dismissed. Sd/-V. RAMKUMAR,

(JUDGE)

ani.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.