Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

THAHAKOYA, S/O.MUHAMMEDKUNJU versus THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


THAHAKOYA, S/O.MUHAMMEDKUNJU v. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE - Bail Appl No. 7356 of 2006(T) [2006] RD-KL 3270 (12 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 7356 of 2006(T)

1. THAHAKOYA, S/O.MUHAMMEDKUNJU,
... Petitioner

2. SUDHEER,

3. KABEER, S/O.NOORUDHEEN,

4. HARSHAD,

Vs

1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
... Respondent

2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

For Petitioner :SRI.SUNNY MATHEW

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :12/12/2006

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Bail Application No. 7356 of 2006
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

DATED: 12-12-2006

O R D E R

In this Petition filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. the petitioners who are accused Nos. 1,2, 4 and 5 in Crime No. 1289/06 of Karunagappally Police Station for offences punishable under Secs.143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 307 and 427 read with Sec. 149 I.P.C., seek their enlargement on bail.

2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Having regard to the nature of the offences, the duration of judicial custody of the petitioners and the other circumstances of the case etc., I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail, with effect from 18-12-2006, on each of them executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the J.F.C.M., Karunagappally, and subject to the following conditions:

1. The petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays. Bail A.No. 7356/06 -:2:-

2. The petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

3. The petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail. If the petitioners commit breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to them shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above.

Sd/-V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

ani. /true copy/ P.A. to Judge Bail A.No. 7356/06 -:3:-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.