CHINNAMMA KURIAKOSE versus DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

High Court of Kerala

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

CHINNAMMA KURIAKOSE v. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE - WP(C) No. 32002 of 2006(I) [2006] RD-KL 3308 (13 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 32002 of 2006(I)

1. CHINNAMMA KURIAKOSE,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
... Respondent

2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

3. SUB INSPLECTOR OF POLICE,

4. P.N.SIVAN,

5. BIJU P.T.,

6. P.S.SUNEESH KUMAR,

For Petitioner :SRI.PAULY MATHEW MURICKEN

For Respondent :SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice J.B.KOSHY The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.PADMANABHAN NAIR

Dated :13/12/2006

O R D E R

J.B.KOSHY & K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, JJ.

W.P.(C)NO.32002 OF 2006 Dated 13th December, 2006

JUDGMENT

Koshy,J

. This is a petition for police protection. According to the petitioner, respondents 4 to 6 and their supporters are causing assault and obstructions to the running of the petitioner's establishment. Respondents 4 to 6 filed a counter affidavit stating that they are not obstructing the working of the petitioner's establishment and they are not assaulting him. In fact, according to them, members of the unions are assaulted the petitioner and two crimes were registered. The crimes registered should be investigated according to law and we are not expressing any opinion regarding the investigation. The submission of the respondents 4 to 6 that they are not creating any obstructions in the working of the petitioner's establishment is recorded. If petitioner is violating any of the provisions of the labour laws as alleged by respondents 4 to 6, they can approach the statutory authority and if they approach the statutory authority, the authority shall take remedial measures, but, both parties shall not take law into their hands. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of  WP(C).32002/2006 2 directing the police to see that lives of the petitioner, his family members, willing employees and contesting respondents are not endangered and working of the factory shall not be obstructed. J.B.KOSHY

JUDGE

K.PADMANABHAN NAIR

JUDGE

tks 

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.