Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

E.VIJAYAN, ASST. TEACHER versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


E.VIJAYAN, ASST. TEACHER v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - WP(C) No. 37670 of 2003(H) [2006] RD-KL 3520 (15 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 37670 of 2003(H)

1. E.VIJAYAN, ASST. TEACHER,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS,

3. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,

4. THE MANAGER, IRINGAL U.P.SCHOOL,

For Petitioner :SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ

For Respondent :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH

Dated :15/12/2006

O R D E R

KURIAN JOSEPH, J.

W.P.(C).No.37670 OF 2003

Dated this the 15th day of December, 2006



J U D G M E N T

Petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P2 communication from the 2nd respondent proposing to recover the salary already paid to him during 15.7.1993 to 31.3.1994. There is no dispute that the petitioner had worked as Assistant Teacher under the 4th respondent. At the relevant time salary was also paid without any demour. It is seen that Ext.P2 order is passed pursuant to the directions issued by this court in Ext.P3 judgment in O.P.No.5416/1994. The issue pertains to the staff fixation during the relevant year. According to the 3rd respondent, for the year 1993-94 there was no post to accompany the petitioner. Ext.P2 order dated 29.10.2003 is passed pursuant to Ext.P1 revision of staff fixation dated 29.9.2003. The issue is of the year 1993-94 academic year. Since the petitioner has actually worked in the school and since the revision of staff fixation is far later, it is not necessary to make any recovery. The petitioner shall be deemed to have been duly paid the salary. The interim order dated 28.11.2003 is made absolute and the writ petition is disposed of as above.

(KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE)

ps


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.