Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

L. SASIKALA versus THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


L. SASIKALA v. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE - WP(C) No. 22288 of 2005(C) [2006] RD-KL 390 (3 August 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 22288 of 2005(C)

1. L.SASIKALA, ATTENDER, KOTTARAKKARA
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE
... Respondent

2. THE KOTTARAKKARA PUBLIC WORKS SKILLED

3. PRESIDENT, KOTTARAKKARA PUBLIC WORKS

For Petitioner :SRI.G.D.PANICKER

For Respondent :SRI.P.SANKARANKUTTY NAIR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.THANKAPPAN

Dated :03/08/2006

O R D E R

K.THANKAPPAN, J.

W.P.(C)NO.22288 OF 2005

Dated this the 3rd day of August, 2006



JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court for a direction to the first respondent to dispose of Ext.P6 representation within a time frame.

2. The petitioner is working as Attender in the Society. According to her, she is qualified to be appointed as Secretary and that without considering the above fact, the management has invited applications for the post of Secretary. The petitioner, therefore, filed Ext.P6 representation before the first respondent. The petitioner is also aggrieved by Ext.P7 show cause notice issued against her and seeks a declaration that Ext.P7 is without jurisdiction. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that the declaration sought for by the petitioner requires no consideration. With regard to Ext.P6 representation filed by the petitioner, the first respondent is directed to consider and pass orders on Ext.P6 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 60 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment after affording the petitioner and other interested parties an opportunity of being heard. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. 2

(K.THANKAPPAN, JUDGE)

sp/


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.