Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BABU, S/O.NARAYANAN versus THE STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


BABU, S/O.NARAYANAN v. THE STATE OF KERALA - Bail Appl No. 7547 of 2006 [2006] RD-KL 3917 (20 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 7547 of 2006()

1. BABU, S/O.NARAYANAN,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent

2. THE DETECTIVE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

For Petitioner :SRI.C.A.CHACKO

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :20/12/2006

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Bail Application No. 7547 of 2006 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Dated, this the 20th day of December 2006

ORDER

Petitioner who is the 3rd accused in Crime No. 344/04 of Valiyathura Police Station for offences punishable under sections 465, 468 and 471 read with Sec. 34 of I.P.C. and Sec.3 read with 12 of the Indian Passport Act and presently Crime No. 469/CR/SI/04 of CBCID, Thiruvananthapuram, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application submitting inter alia that the other two accused persons are still absconding and that the only role of the petitioner was not merely introducing Rejitha Subrahmonian but also in sharing with A1 and A2 the sum of Rs. 25,000/- received from Rejitha for preparing forged emigration clearance.

3. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to a person like the petitioner. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the investigating officer and then apply for regular bail. The petitioner shall surrender before the investigating officer within one week from today for the purpose of custodial interrogation and B.A. No. 7547 of 2006 -:2:- recovery of documents, if any. Thereafter, the petitioner shall be produced before the Magistrate having jurisdiction who shall consider and dispose of his application for regular bail, if any, filed by the petitioner, preferably on the same day on which it is filed. With the above observation, this application is disposed of. V. RAMKUMAR,

(JUDGE)

ani.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.