Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

N.A.V.ABDULLA, MANAGING PARTNER versus K.T.RAVUNNI, MANAGING PARTNER

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


N.A.V.ABDULLA, MANAGING PARTNER v. K.T.RAVUNNI, MANAGING PARTNER - Crl Rev Pet No. 532 of 2006 [2006] RD-KL 4128 (21 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl Rev Pet No. 532 of 2006()

1. N.A.V.ABDULLA, MANAGING PARTNER,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. K.T.RAVUNNI, MANAGING PARTNER,
... Respondent

2. STATE OF KERALA,

For Petitioner :SRI.GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE

For Respondent :SRI.M.M.ANTO

The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA

Dated :21/12/2006

O R D E R

K.HEMA, J.

CRL.R.P.NO.532 OF 2006

Dated this the 21st day of December, 2006

O R D E R

Revision Petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.506 of 1996 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Payyannur. First respondent is the complainant therein. Revision petitioner was convicted and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for six months and also directed to pay compensation of Rs.5,000/- to the complainant in default of payment to undergo simple imprisonment for two months under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. In appeal filed by him, the conviction and sentence were confirmed by the Additional Sessions Court, Thalassery. This revision arises from the said conviction and sentence.

2. At the time of hearing, both sides submitted that a petition as Crl.M.Appl.No.13224 of 2006 is filed for compounding the offence. It is also submitted by both sides that the matter is settled out of court amicably between the parties. On hearing both sides and on going through the averments in the petition, I am satisfied that this is a fit case to grant permission to compound the offence. In the result, revision petitioner is acquitted of offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, as offence is compounded. He is set at liberty forthwith. Crl.M.Appl.No.13224 OF 2006 and the revision petition are allowed.

K.HEMA, JUDGE

vgs.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.