Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BIMAL HARI, "SREEHARI", MUTTOM P.O. versus SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AROOR

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


BIMAL HARI, "SREEHARI", MUTTOM P.O. v. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AROOR - Bail Appl No. 7624 of 2006(B) [2006] RD-KL 4228 (29 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 7624 of 2006(B)

1. BIMAL HARI, "SREEHARI", MUTTOM P.O.,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AROOR.
... Respondent

2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

For Petitioner :SRI.N.K.MOHANLAL

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

Dated :29/12/2006

O R D E R

M.N.Krishnan, J.


========================
B.A.No.7624 of 2006
========================

Dated this the 29th day of December, 2006.

ORDER

Petitioner is the first accused in Crime No.302 of 2006 of Aroor Police Station. Originally, a complaint under Section 138 of N.I. Act was filed and it was withdrawn and a fresh complaint was filed under Sections 420, 468 and 471 read with Section 34 I.P.C.

2. Notice given to the Public Prosecutor. It is submitted that the petitioner is not likely to go out of the station and further his custody is not necessary and even the complainant has no definite case under Section 138 or the other Sections.

3. I feel that bail can be granted under Section 438 of Crl.P.C.. Therefore, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is granted bail subject to the following conditions: (1) The petitioner shall execute a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two BA 7624/06 -: 2 :- solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Officer arresting him in the event of his arrest. (2) The petitioner shall not intimidate the prosecution witnesses or attempt to interfere with the investigation. (3) The order of bail shall be in force for a period of six weeks. M.N. Krishnan, Judge. ess 29/12


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.