Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

GOPALAKRISHNAN versus SPECIAL SALE OFFICER

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


GOPALAKRISHNAN v. SPECIAL SALE OFFICER - WP(C) No. 19367 of 2006(E) [2006] RD-KL 765 (15 September 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 19367 of 2006(E)

1. GOPALAKRISHNAN, AGED 55,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. SPECIAL SALE OFFICER,
... Respondent

2. THE VADAKKEKARA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE

For Petitioner :SRI.V.A.PRADEEP KUMAR

For Respondent :SRI.T.K.SHAJAHAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.THANKAPPAN

Dated :15/09/2006

O R D E R

K. THANKAPPAN, JUDGE

W.P.(C). NO. 19367 OF 2006

Dated this the 15th day of August 2006



JUDGEMENT

The petitioner had availed a loan from the second respondent and now the loan became due. Hence steps are taken to recover the amount from the petitioner. The petitioner now submits that he is willing to remit the amount and also submits that he is entitled for the benefit for one time settlement on the basis of the circulars issued by the authorities. When the writ petition came up for admission, this court directed the petitioner to remit an amount of Rs. 10,000/- and that Rs.10,000/-is already remitted. Now this court heard the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent and as the petitioner expressed his willingness to remit the amount and it is proper for the second respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner for the benefit of one time settlement, for which the petitioner will file the petition within 15 days from today. If the petitioner files such application for one time settlement the bank-second respondent shall consider the same and shall pass appropriate orders thereon within 30 days of receipt of such application. Further it is directed that the petitioner shall remit an amount of Rs.7,500/- (Rupees Seven Thousand Five Hundred Only) within one month from today. If the petitioner has any dispute regarding the exact amount due in his name, that also may be incorporated in the petition for getting one time settlement. With the above the Writ Petition is disposed of.

K. THANKAPPAN, JUDGE.

RV/


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.