MOOSA, AGED 41 YEARS versus THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER

High Court of Kerala

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

MOOSA, AGED 41 YEARS v. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER - Bail Appl No. 5459 of 2006 [2006] RD-KL 802 (19 September 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 5459 of 2006()

1. MOOSA, AGED 41 YEARS,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
... Respondent

2. STATE, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

For Petitioner :SRI.M.B.PRAJITH

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice J.M.JAMES

Dated :19/09/2006

O R D E R

J.M.JAMES, J.

B.A. 5459/2006

DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2006

O R D E R

The petitioner is the second accused in crime No.173/2006 of Erumapetty Police Station, which is now transferred and re-registered as crime No.219/2006 of Cheruthuruthy Police Station, for the offence punishable under Section 379 IPC and also under Section 21(1) read with Section 4(i) of the Mines and Minerals Regulation and Development Act (M.M.R.D.Act). The occurrence took place on 19.7.2006. The petitioner is before this Court, under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2. I heard the arguments of both sides. The prosecution submitted that the petitioner is the owner of a lorry, in which the sand was unauthorisedly transported. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that he had been made an accused, only because he is the owner of the lorry.

3. The prosecution opposed the granting of a pre-  B.A.5459/2006 2 arrest order, on the plea that the petitioner is a station rowdy and he had been committing similar offence, in the earlier occasion also.

4. After considering the submissions of both sides, I direct the petitioner to surrender before the Investigating Officer, who is investigating crime No.219/2006 of Cheruthuruthy police station, on 29.9.2006 between 9.30 a.m and 10.00 a.m.

5. The Investigating Officer shall interrogate the petitioner and produce him before the Court below. The learned Magistrate shall consider the application for bail, that may be filed by the petitioner, and pass orders on the same day of the production of the accused, on merit. The application is disposed of as above. J.M.JAMES

JUDGE

mrcs 

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.