Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

M. NARAYANA BHAT versus RDO., KANHANGAD

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


M. NARAYANA BHAT v. RDO., KANHANGAD - Crl Rev Pet No. 767 of 1997(8) [2006] RD-KL 820 (20 September 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl Rev Pet No. 767 of 1997(8)

1. M.NARAYANA BHAT
... Petitioner

Vs

1. RDO., KANHANGAD
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER

For Respondent :SRI.M.SASINDRAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.PADMANABHAN NAIR

Dated :20/09/2006

O R D E R

K. PADMANABHAN NAIR ,J

Crl.R.P.NO.767 OF 1997 Dated, this the 20th day of September, 2006

ORDER

Advocate Shri M.Sasindran takes notice for respondents 2 to 13. Learned Public Prosecutor takes notice for respondent No.1. So there is no defect. Criminal Revision Petition itself is heard and disposed of as agreed to both sides.

2. The petitioner filed a petition before the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Kasaragod alleging that the respondents caused obstruction to a public pathway. There was also a prayer to initiate proceedings under Section 107 of Criminal Procedure Code. The Sub Divisional Magistrate conducted a local inspection and noticed that though initially some obstructions were caused to a public pathway, but on the date of examination there was no obstruction existed and the road was fit for vehicular traffic. It is also held that there is no material to initiate action under Section 107 of Criminal Procedure Code and hence dropped further proceedings. I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order after a lapse of nine years. If any obstruction is now caused, it is open to the petitioner to approach the competent authority for redressal of his grievance. In the result, the Criminal Revision Petition is disposed of as above. K. PADMANABHAN NAIR

JUDGE

K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, J.

Crl.R.P.NO.767 OF 1997

ORDER

20TH SEPTEMBER, 2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.