Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KARIKUTTY, S/O. VELAYUDHAN versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


KARIKUTTY, S/O. VELAYUDHAN v. STATE OF KERALA - Bail Appl No. 5341 of 2006 [2006] RD-KL 857 (22 September 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 5341 of 2006()

1. KARIKUTTY, S/O. VELAYUDHAN,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SMT.JAYASREE MANOJ

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice J.M.JAMES

Dated :22/09/2006

O R D E R

J.M.JAMES, J.

B.A. 5341/2006

DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2006

O R D E R

The petitioner was found in illegal possession of 500 liters of illicit arrack, by the Inspector of Excise Range, Tirur, who registered C.R.No.20/2006 of that Excise Range, under Section 8(1) & (2) of the Abkari Act. The petitioner is aged 61. However, it is submitted by the prosecution that there is another case registered against the petitioner and this offence had been committed, while he was on bail.

2. In the circumstances of the case, because of the operation of the Section 41A of the Abkari Act, the petitioner is not entitled for bail. However, the learned counsel produced a medical certificate stating that the wife of the petitioner is suffering from acute Cervico Brachial Neuralgia right side, with Poly arthralgia. She is undergoing treatment in the Government Hospital, Tirur.

3. The counsel submitted that the wife of the B.A.5341/2006 2 petitioner is to be attended and there is no one else to look after her. The petitioner got married and though the age of the wife is 35 years, she is not able to look after herself alone.

4. I had directed the learned Public Prosecutor to verify the facts that are submitted by the learned counsel, with regard to the admission and treatment of the wife of the petitioner and also the ailments, stated thereafter. However, the prosecution submits that though he sent the communication to the Inspector of Excise Range, Tirur, no written message is so far received.

5. In the above facts situation of the case, accepting the certificate that he had produced before me, I grant bail and release the petitioner from jail, subject to the following conditions:-

(a). The petitioner shall execute a bond for Rs.25,000/-, with two solvent sureties, each for the like sum, to the satisfaction of the competent B.A.5341/2006 3 Magistrate Court.

(b). The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer, once in a week, on every Thursday, between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m., for a period of two months, starting from 28.9.2006. The application is allowed as above. J.M.JAMES

JUDGE

mrcs


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.