Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

P. GOPI, DAILY DEPOSIT COLLECTOR versus THE NILAMBUR CO

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


P. GOPI, DAILY DEPOSIT COLLECTOR v. THE NILAMBUR CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK - WP(C) No. 4926 of 2005(J) [2006] RD-KL 995 (6 October 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 4926 of 2005(J)

1. P.GOPI, DAILY DEPOSIT COLLECTOR,
... Petitioner

2. MOHANABU M.K., DAILY DEPOSIT COLLECTOR,

3. MOHANDAS, DAILY DEPOSIT COLLECTOR,

4. SATYAN K., DAILY DEPOSIT COLLECTOR,

5. DEVADAS E.P., DAILY DEPOSIT COLECTOR,

6. T.ALIKUTTY, DAILY DEPOSIT COLLECTOR,

7. K.RAJAMOHAN, DAILY DEPOSIT COLLECTOR,

8. K.INDU, DAILY DEPOSIT COLLECTOR,

9. SURESH E.K., DAILY DEPOSIT COLLECTOR,

10. ABDUL LATHIF.P., DAILY DEPOSIT COLLECTOR

11. VENUGOPALAN, DALY DEPOSIT COLLECTOR,

12. SUNIL KUMAR P. DAILY DEPOIT COLLECTOR,

Vs

1. THE NILAMBUR CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK
... Respondent

2. THE SECRETARY, NILAMBUR CO-OPERATIVE

3. ASSISTANT RGGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE

4. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIEITES,

5. STATE OF KERALA - REPRESENTED BY THE

For Petitioner :SRI.V.RAJENDRAN

For Respondent :SPL.GOVT.PLEADER-(SRI.B.S.SWATHIKUMAR)

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.THANKAPPAN

Dated :06/10/2006

O R D E R

K. Thankappan, J.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W.P.(C). No. 4926 of 2005
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dated this the 6th day of October, 2006



JUDGMENT

The grievance of the petitioners is that their service has not been regularized in the light of Ext.P4 circular issued by the 4th respondent. The objection raised by the respondent bank is that the bank has already requested the 4th respondent Registrar of Co-operative Societies to sanction additional posts to regularize the service of the petitioners. Now as per order No. CRB 4983/2006 dated 31-8-2006 issued by the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies the posts are sanctioned. In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondents 1 and 2 to take steps to regularize the service of the petitioners. This shall be done as early as possible, at any rate within 60 days from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment. K.Thankappan, Judge. mn.

K. Thankappan,J.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W.P.(C) No. /2006
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Judgment 6-10-2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.