Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

K.RAVEENDRAN, RESIDING AT B CLASS versus RAJAN, RESIDING AT B CLASS KUNIYIL

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


K.RAVEENDRAN, RESIDING AT B CLASS v. RAJAN, RESIDING AT B CLASS KUNIYIL - WP(C) No. 15654 of 2004(L) [2007] RD-KL 10263 (14 June 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 15654 of 2004(L)

1. K.RAVEENDRAN, RESIDING AT B CLASS
... Petitioner

Vs

1. RAJAN, RESIDING AT B CLASS KUNIYIL,
... Respondent

2. PUZHPA W/O. RAJAN, RESIDING AT B CLASS

For Petitioner :SRI.SANTHARAM.P

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE

Dated :14/06/2007

O R D E R

PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J.

.......................................................... W.P.(C)No.15654 OF 2004 ...........................................................

DATED THIS THE 14TH JUNE, 2007



J U D G M E N T

Exts.P3 and P4 orders dismissing an application for condonation of delay of 230 days caused in the matter of filing the application to restore the appeal and consequently dismissing the restoration application itself are under challenge in this proceedings under Article 227 of the Constitution initiated by the petitioner who was the plaintiff in the suit.

2. Even though the respondents have been served with notice, they have not entered appearance to resist the prayers in the Writ Petition.

3. Having regard to the submissions of Sri.P.Santharam, learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the view that the learned Sub Judge was not justified in insisting that the advocate who himself had sworn to the affidavit in support of the application should have produced medical certificate also. The learned Sub Judge could have allowed the applications at least on terms.

4. In this case since the respondents have not entered appearance, I do not propose to award costs to them. However, considering the inconvenience which has been caused to the courts, I am inclined to grant relief to the petitioner only on terms. Accordingly WP(C)N0.15654/04 Exts.P3 and P4 will stand set aside on condition that the petitioner pays a sum of Rs.500/- by way of costs to the High Court Legal Services Committee within three weeks from today. If payment is not made, Exts.P3 and P4 will stand confirmed and the Writ Petition will stand dismissed. If payment is made and receipt produced before the court below, the court below will restore A.S.No.115 of 1999 and dispose of that appeal, after hearing both sides, in accordance with law. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.

tgl (PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE)

WP(C)N0.15654/04 WP(C)N0.15654/04


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.