Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

G.CHANDRAN, MUMALVILLA HOUSE versus SHRIRAM INVESTMENT LTD.HAVING THE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


G.CHANDRAN, MUMALVILLA HOUSE v. SHRIRAM INVESTMENT LTD.HAVING THE - Crl MC No. 1198 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 10339 (15 June 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 1198 of 2007()

1. G.CHANDRAN, MUMALVILLA HOUSE,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. SHRIRAM INVESTMENT LTD.HAVING THE
... Respondent

2. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY DIRECTOR OF

For Petitioner :SRI.P.BABU KUMAR

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :15/06/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J.

Crl.M.C.No.1198 of 2007

Dated this the 15th day of June 2007

O R D E R

The petitioner is the accused in a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. That prosecution is now pending before the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Aluva. The petitioner has come before this court with the prayer that the case may be quashed.

2. What is the reason? The learned counsel for the petitioner raises only a dispute regarding territorial jurisdiction. The payment was allegedly made at Ernakulam. The bank which dishonoured the cheque is at Kottayam. The accused resides at Kuravilangadu. But the proceedings has been initiated before the court at Aluva.

3. The learned counsel for the respondent fairly concedes that in view of the dictum in Ahammedkutty Haji vs. State of Kerala [2007(1) KLT 68], it cannot be said that the court at Aluva has the territorial jurisdiction. Crl.M.C.No.1198/07 2

4. In the absence of contentions in that aspect, I accept that submission. The mere fact that notice of demand was issued by a counsel within the jurisdiction of the court at Aluva, cannot obviously confer jurisdiction on the court at Aluva to take cognizance in the matter. The bank which dishonoured the cheque is situated in Kottayam. I am, in these circumstances, satisfied that the lesser relief of transfer can be granted to the petitioner. I am unable to agree that the complaint can be quashed for that reason.

5. In the result, this petition is allowed. C.C.No.803/2005 pending before Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Aluva is transferred to the court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kottayam. The learned Magistrate at Aluva shall forthwith forward the records to the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kottayam. The parties shall appear before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kottayam on 09/07/2007 without waiting for any further process.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge Crl.M.C.No.1198/07 3 Crl.M.C.No.1198/07 4

R.BASANT, J.

CRL.M.CNo.

ORDER

21ST DAY OF MAY2007


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.