Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

PAREETH, S/O MOITHEEN versus STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


PAREETH, S/O MOITHEEN v. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE - Crl MC No. 1741 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 10386 (15 June 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 1741 of 2007()

1. PAREETH, S/O MOITHEEN,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
... Respondent

2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,

For Petitioner :SRI.C.P.UDAYABHANU

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :15/06/2007

O R D E R

V.RAMKUMAR, J.

Crl.M.C.Nos. 1741/07, 1748/07 & 1760/07 IN B.A.2734/2007 Dated this 15th day of June, 2007

O R D E R

Cr.M.C.1741/2007 is filed by the accused in Crime No.67/2007 of Pothanicadu police station for offences punishable under Sections 447 and 307 IPC, with regard to an occurrence which took place on 25.4.2007 at 8.30 a.m, in which one Mydeen was allegedly attacked by the petitioner resulting in a deep cut on the right hand and amputation of the right palm of the said Mydeen. Without noticing the gravity of the injuries and inclusion of Section 307 IPC in the offences registered, on 15.5.2007 this Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused (Pareeth).

2. Evidently taking note of the seriousness of the Crime and the grant of anticipatory bail in such a case, the State has filed Crl.M.C.1760/2007 for cancellation of the bail. The accused has filed Crl.M.C.1741/2007 for correction of the bail order so as to include Section 307 IPC as well. Mydeen, the injured, has filed Crl.M.C.1748/2007 also for cancellation of bail. Crl.M.C.Nos.1741, 1748 & 1760/2007 2

3. When these applications came up for further hearing today, the learned counsel for the accused, the petitioner in Crl.M.C.1741/2007, submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the bail application. Accordingly B.A.2734/2007 is permitted to be withdrawn and the order for anticipatory bail granted in that application will stand recalled. The applications are disposed of as above. V.RAMKUMAR,

JUDGE

mrcs


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.