Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KANNAN, S/O.MUTHU, KUZHIYAKKAD VEEDU versus STATE, REPRESENTED BY S.I. OF POLICE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


KANNAN, S/O.MUTHU, KUZHIYAKKAD VEEDU v. STATE, REPRESENTED BY S.I. OF POLICE - Bail Appl No. 3445 of 2007(K) [2007] RD-KL 10455 (18 June 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 3445 of 2007(K)

1. KANNAN, S/O.MUTHU, KUZHIYAKKAD VEEDU,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE, REPRESENTED BY S.I. OF POLICE,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.VINOD KUMAR.C

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :18/06/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J.

B.A.No.3445 of 2007

Dated this the 18th day of June 2007

O R D E R

Application for anticipatory bail. A crime was initially registered inter alia under Section 324 read with 149 I.P.C. Now the allegation under Section 326 I.P.C is also included.

2. Accused 1 and 2 have come before this court for anticipatory bail and by order dated 14/6/2007, another Bench of this Court had permitted those accused persons to surrender before the investigating officer between 21/6/2007 and 23/6/2007 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. It is also observed that the said accused shall be produced on the same day before the learned Magistrate who shall consider their application for regular bail preferably on the same day on which such application is filed.

3. The short prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the benefit of the said order may be extended to the petitioner herein also. I find no reason not to do so and the learned Public Prosecutor fairly does not oppose the said prayer. B.A.No.3445/07 2

4. This petition is, in these circumstances, allowed. The petitioner is permitted to surrender before the investigating officer on any day at 10 a.m between 21/6/2007 and 23/6/2007 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. The petitioner shall thereafter be produced on the same day before Magistrate who shall consider the application for bail on merits, on the same day on which such application is filed.

5. With the above observations, this petition is allowed.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge B.A.No.3445/07 3 B.A.No.3445/07 4

R.BASANT, J.

CRL.M.CNo.

ORDER

21ST DAY OF MAY2007


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.