Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

R.THANKAPPAN NAIR versus DY.INSPECTOR GENERAL , TVM

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


R.THANKAPPAN NAIR v. DY.INSPECTOR GENERAL , TVM - WA No. 1373 of 2000 [2007] RD-KL 10495 (18 June 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WA No. 1373 of 2000()

1. R.THANKAPPAN NAIR
... Petitioner

Vs

1. DY.INSPECTOR GENERAL , TVM.
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.N.NANDAKUMARA MENON

For Respondent :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

Dated :18/06/2007

O R D E R

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANTONY DOMINIC, JJ.


===============================
W.A. NO. 1373 OF 2000
======================

Dated this the 18th day of June, 2007



J U D G M E N T

Radhakrishnan, J.

Original petition was preferred by the appellant herein seeking a writ of certiorari to quash Ext.P3 order of barring of two increments with cumulative effect. Petitioner has retired from service. Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the petitioner on the allegation that he had helped the U.T.Prisoner to write a request to the Manager, Indian Overseas Bank on 22.1.94 for obtaining a cheque leaf and forwarded the same through his friend without obtaining permission from the Superintendent, Sub Jail and a detailed enquiry was conducted and petitioner was found guilty. Initially it was proposed to remove him from service and later it was decided to impose the minor punishment of barring of two increments with cumulative effect. A review petition was preferred by the petitioner, which was also rejected. The main contention raised by the petitioner was that while conducting the enquiry, the principle of natural justice was not WA 1373/2000 followed. We find that proper enquiry was conducted and we find no infirmity in the judgment of the learned Single Judge. In the circumstances, we are not inclined to take a different view taken by the learned Single Judge. Appeal lacks merits. Dismissed.

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE.

Rp


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.