Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

C.V.SHAJI, DRIVER versus KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


C.V.SHAJI, DRIVER v. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD - WA No. 2685 of 2002(D) [2007] RD-KL 10571 (19 June 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WA No. 2685 of 2002(D)

1. C.V.SHAJI, DRIVER,
... Petitioner

2. GAYATHRIDEVI P.K., SKILLED ASSISTANT,

3. USHADEVI.C., TYPIST, -DO- -DO-.

4. SEBIMOL B.VARGHESE,

5. JAYALEKSHMY M.N., COMPUTER OPERATOR,

6. SARITHA K.S., SKILLED ASSISTANT

7. ANILKUMAR.N., GARDENER-CUM-CARETAKER,

8. ALIAS A.D., DRIVER, -DO- -DO-

9. C.T.JAYPRAKASAN, OFFICE ATTENDANT,

10. K.J.ANTONY, OFFICE ASSISTANT, -DO- -DO-

11. P.A.CARLOSE, DRIVER, -DO- -DO-

12. C.M.NASSAR, DRIVER, -DO- -DO-

13. YOUSEPH P.V., OFFICE ASSISTANT, -DO- -DO

14. JOY THOMAS.P., SKILLED ASSISTANT

15. K.P.GOPALAKRISHNAN,

16. JAYAPRAKASH V.V.,

17. C.V.JOY, SKILLED MAZDOOR (ELECTRICAL),

18. THANKAMMA K.M., TYPIST, -DO- -DO-

19. REENA XAVIER, SKILLED ASSISTANT,

20. M.K.PATHUMMA, SWEEPER, -DO- -DO-

21. LEELA P.K., OFFICE ASSISTANT, -DO- -DO-

22. P.K.THANKAMMA, SWEEPER, -DO- -DO-

23. ALEEMA IBRAHIM, SWEEPER, -DO- -DO-

24. SURESH KUMAR V.M., SKILLED (I.T.I) -DO-

25. M.A.RAVI, PLUMBER, -DO- -DO-

26. M.D.JOSE, GARDENER, K.S.E.B.,

27. K.JAYACHANDRAN NAIR, SKILLED ASSISTANT &

28. M.A.PAREED, OFFICE ASSISTANT, -DO- -DO-

29. THANKAMMA T.K., SWEEPER, -DO- -DO-

30. BIJU P.D., DRIVER, -DO- -DO-

31. V.S.ABDULKHADER, OFFICE ASSISTANT,

32. SHAMSUDEEN V.M., SKILLED ASSISTANT,

33. ISMAEL T.K., SKILLED ASSISTANT,

34. SUPRAN T.K., SKILLED ASSISTANT

35. SANTHOSH KUMAR C.C., SKILLED ASSISTANT,

36. SURESH KUMAR I.P., FIREMAN, -DO- -DO-

37. SASI.N.K., SKILLED ASSISTANT,

38. SURENDRAN.A.U., SKILLED ASSISTANT,

39. P.D.JOY, DRIVER, -DO- -DO-

40. V.K.IBRAHIM, GARDENER, -DO- -DO-

41. PRASAD C.T., SKILLED ASSISTANT &

42. SUKUMARAN M.K., WORKER, -DO- -DO-

43. SALAM.T.A., WORKER, -DO- -DO-

44. TINY FRANCIS.K.P., SKILLED ASSISTANT,

45. KANNAN A.P., BOILER ATTENDANT, -DO- -DO-

46. ANIL KUMAR.V.R., SKILLED ASSISTANT,

47. ABY MATHEW, SKILLED ASSISTANT,

48. SHOUKATH ALI.A., FIREMAN, -DO- -DO-

49. NEVIN.K.M., BOILER ATTENDANT,

50. SHAIJU KURIAKOSE, SKILLED ASSIST.(I.T.I)

51. SIJU KURIAN, SKILLED ASSISTANT (I.T.I.),

52. GEORGE.K.C., DRIVER, -DO- -DO-

53. BIJU ABRAHAM, SKILLED ASSISTANT (I.T.I.)

Vs

1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,
... Respondent

2. P.RAJENDRAN PILLAI, DRIVER,

3. RAJAN.P.K., DRIVER, K.S.E.B.,

4. GEORGE V.C., DRIVER, K.S.E.B., W.B.P.,

5. NEPSY XAVIER, SKILLED ASSISTANT

6. VINOD MATTAMAN, DRIVER, K.S.E.B.,W.B.P.,

7. THERESSA THOMAS, SKILLED ASSISTANT,

8. SHEELA KRISHNANKUTTY, OFFICE ASSISTANT,

9. N.D.DEEPAK, CARE TAKER, K.S.E.B.,W.B.P.,

10. RAJEEVAN.T.K., WORKER, K.S.E.B.,

11. SURESH T.K., DRIVER, -DO- -DO-

12. JOSEPH.C.A., DRIVER, -DO- -DO-

13. RAJESH.K.L., DRIVER, -DO- -DO-

14. SAJITHA.K.K., SWEEPER, K.S.E.B.,

15. RAJANI.L.T., SWEEPER & OFFICE ASSISTANT,

16. T.K.KRISHNAKUMAR, OVERSEAR, K.S.E.B.,

17. REEBA.K., SUB ENGINEER

18. REKHA.V.K., SUB ENGINEER

19. INDIRA.P.V., TYPIST, -DO- -DO-

20. RAJESH P.ARAVIND,

21. AYYOOB V.A., OFFICE ASSISTANT,

22. SUNILKUMAR N.R., SUB ENGINEER

23. AJIL KUMAR.K.N., SHIFT ASSISTANT,

24. P.N.KRISHNANKUTTY, DRIVER,

25. MANOJ.P.UNNI, SHIFT ASSISTANT,

26. MINI.P.V., SKILLED ASSISTANT,

27. VINAYAKUMAR.V.B., OVERSEAR,

28. RAJAN.P.S., DRIVER,

29. REJI.K.THARIAN, -DO- -DO- W/B,

30. BIJU.M.D., OFFICE ASSISTANT,

31. SMITHA.T.S., SUB ENGINEER, (ELECTRICAL),

32. SAJEEVAN K.S., SUB ENGINEER, -DO- -DO-

33. TOMY MATHEW, SUB ENGINEER, -DO- -DO-

For Petitioner :SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR

For Respondent :SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

Dated :19/06/2007

O R D E R

K.S.Radhakrishnan &

Antony Dominic, JJ.


========================
W.A.No.2685 of 2002
========================

Dated this the 19th day of June, 2007.



JUDGMENT

Radhakrishnan,J.

Appellants were appointed on a provisional basis under Rule 9(a) (i) of K.S. & S.S.R. Original Petition was preferred to regularise the service of the petitioners. Learned single Judge dismissed the Original Petition against which this Writ Appeal has been filed. When the matter came up for admission, this Court passed an order on 5.11.2002 stating that the petitioners' service should not be terminated for accommodating contract employees, but it was ordered that if they are not required in the service or P.S.C. hands are available, this will not stand in the way to take appropriate action. No further orders are necessary. Writ Appeal is disposed of. K.S.Radhakrishnan, Judge. Antony Dominic, Judge. ess 20/6


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.