Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

K.M.SUDHEER BASHA, S/O MOHAMMED versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


K.M.SUDHEER BASHA, S/O MOHAMMED v. STATE OF KERALA - Bail Appl No. 3843 of 2007(K) [2007] RD-KL 10734 (20 June 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 3843 of 2007(K)

1. K.M.SUDHEER BASHA, S/O MOHAMMED,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE K.

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :20/06/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J

= = = = = = = = = = = = = B.A.No. 3843 Of 2007 = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Dated this the 20th day of June, 2007

ORDER

Application for anticipatory bail. Petitioner faces allegations in a prosecution for offences punishable under section 279 and 338 IPC. He has not appeared before the learned Magistrate. Consequently a warrant of arrest has been issued by the learned Magistrate. The petitioner prays that directions under Section 438 may be issued in his favour.

2. After the decision in Bharat Chaudhary v. State of Bihar [A.I.R 2003 S.C 4662], it is trite that powers under Section 438 Cr.P.C can be invoked in favour of a person who apprehends arrest in execution of a non bailable warrant issued by a court in a pending proceedings. But even for that, sufficient and satisfactory reasons must be shown to exist. I am not persuaded in the facts and circumstances of this case to conclude that any such reasons exist.

3. It is for the petitioner to appear before the learned Magistrate and explain to the learned Magistrate the circumstances under which he could not earlier appear before the learned Magistrate. I have no reason to assume that the learned Magistrate would not consider such application on merits, in accordance with law and B.A.No.3843 of 2007 2 expeditiously. Every court must do the same. No special or specific direction appears to be necessary. Sufficient general directions have already been issued in Alice George v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police [2003(1) KLT 339].

4. This application is, in these circumstances, dismissed, but with the specific observation that if the petitioner appears before the learned Magistrate and applies for bail after giving sufficient prior notice to the Prosecutor in charge of the case, the learned Magistrate must proceed to pass appropriate orders on merits and expeditiously - on the date of surrender itself, unless there are compelling reasons. Hand over a copy of this order to the learned counsel for the petitioner.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

sj


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.