Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

P.C.CHAMY, S/O.NEELY, RESIDING AT versus THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


P.C.CHAMY, S/O.NEELY, RESIDING AT v. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR - Crl MC No. 1791 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 10899 (21 June 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 1791 of 2007()

1. P.C.CHAMY, S/O.NEELY, RESIDING AT
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR.
... Respondent

2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE

For Petitioner :SRI.SIBY MATHEW

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :21/06/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J

Crl.M.C.No.1791 of 2007

Dated this the 21st day of June, 2007

O R D E R

The grievance of the petitioner is that no crime has been registered and no proper investigation has been conducted into the grievances raised by him in Annexures-A2 and A5 complaints, which were acknowledged by the respondent under Annexures-A3 and A6. The learned Public Prosecutor has been taking time from time to time and today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned Public Prosecutor submits that he has obtained instructions that Crime No.238 of 2007 of Pazhayannoor Police Station has been registered today, inter alia, under Section 435 r/w 149 I.P.C. The learned Public Prosecutor submits that the Investigating Officer shall conduct a proper and efficient investigation.

2. I accept the submissions of the learned Public Prosecutor. I am satisfied that no further directions are necessary in this petition now. Of course, I see merit in the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the Investigating Officer may be directed to conduct a proper and efficient investigation. No specific directions to that effect are necessary. However the crime registered has to be promptly interrogated. The request to place any outer time limit is also found to be not expedient. Crl.M.C.No.1791 of 2007 2

3. Suffice it to say that, I accept the submissions of the learned Public Prosecutor that the crime which has already been registered shall be properly investigated now. This Crl.M.C is, in these circumstances, dismissed accepting the said submissions. Needless to say that if no proper investigation is conducted, the opportunity or option of the petitioner to come to this Court again with such grievance shall remain unfettered by this dismissal.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

rtr/- Crl.M.C.No.1791 of 2007 3


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.