Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

V.RAMANANDA PRABHU versus THE CORPORATION OF COCHIN, REP

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


V.RAMANANDA PRABHU v. THE CORPORATION OF COCHIN, REP - WA No. 65 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 1110 (15 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WA No. 65 of 2007()

1. V.RAMANANDA PRABHU,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE CORPORATION OF COCHIN, REP.
... Respondent

2. SHRI. NAHAS,

3. V.M.NOUFAL,

4. V.M.NAJEEB,

5. THE DIRECTOR,

6. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE

For Petitioner :SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY

For Respondent :SRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.V.K.BALI The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.RAMACHANDRAN

Dated :15/01/2007

O R D E R

V.K. BALI, C.J. & M.RAMACHANDRAN, J.

W.A.No.65 of 2007

Dated, this the 15th day of January, 2007



JUDGMENT

V.K.Bali,C.J.(Oral) This writ appeal has been filed challenging the interim order dated 18th December, 2006 in W.P.(C) No.16274 of 2005. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant while referring to the observations made by the learned Single Judge in paragraph 4 of the interim order states that the properties of all the parties which may be 14 in number shall have to be measured out in the way and manner the order has been passed. The contention does not appear to be correct. The following observation made by the learned Single Judge will make it clear that properties of both parties only have to be measured:

"There being no plan available with the writ petitioner about the construction of bis building, the properties of both parties should be measured out basing on the title deeds in their possession, and the respective boundaries shall clearly be marked in the plan so prepared." W.A.No.65/2007 2

2. The parties in this case are petitioner and respondents 3 and 4. Be that as it may, we make it clear that the measurement will be only with regard to the parties as mentioned above. Before passing this order we have heard counsel for both parties. V.K. BALI, CHIEF JUSTICE. M.RAMACHANDRAN,

JUDGE.

vns


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.