Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

P.MURALEEDHARAN, AGED 39 versus THE COMMISSIONER

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


P.MURALEEDHARAN, AGED 39 v. THE COMMISSIONER - Con Case(C) No. 780 of 2007(S) [2007] RD-KL 11156 (25 June 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Con Case(C) No. 780 of 2007(S)

1. P.MURALEEDHARAN, AGED 39,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE COMMISSIONER,
... Respondent

2. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER,

3. NARAYANAN, INSPECTOR,

For Petitioner :SRI.K.SIVAKUMAR

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

Dated :25/06/2007

O R D E R

H.L. DATTU, C.J. & K.T. SANKARAN, J.

................................................................................... CONTEMPT CASE ( C)No. 780 OF 2007 ...................................................................................

Dated this the 25th June, 2007



J U D G M E N T

H.L. Dattu, C.J.: The only direction, issued by this court , to the first respondent herein, while disposing of Writ Petition No. 16793 of 2005 dated 9th January, 2007, was to permit the petitioners in the Writ Petition to take charge as non-hereditary trustees of Kunnummal Sree Bhagawati temple. Alleging that the respondents have disobeyed the orders and directions issued by this court, the complainant is before us in this Contempt case.

2. Government Pleader has taken notice for the respondents.

3. When the matter is posted before this court today, learned Senior Government Pleader Shri M.R. Sabu has produced before us, a communication received by him from the Commissioner of HR & CE (Admn.)Department, Kozhikode dated 22.06.2007. In that, it is stated that the respondents have cancelled the appointment of fit person and that he has been directed to hand over charge of all records and accounts etc., to the Chairman.

4. In view of the order of cancellation passed by the respondents CONTEMPT CASE ( C)No. 780 OF 2007 2 on 21.06.2007 and further direction to the fit person, who was appointed earlier by order dated 12.02.2007, to hand over charge of all records and accounts etc., to the Chairman, in our opinion, there is substantial compliance of the orders and directions issued by this court. Therefore, further proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act need not be taken up. Accordingly, the proceedings in this Contempt Case are dropped. Ordered accordingly. H.L. DATTU, CHIEF JUSTICE. K.T. SANKARAN,

JUDGE.

lk


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.