Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

THANKAMANI, W/O. KARAMACKEL KUMARAN versus SIVADASAN, S/O. VENNEKOTTU KARAPPAN

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


THANKAMANI, W/O. KARAMACKEL KUMARAN v. SIVADASAN, S/O. VENNEKOTTU KARAPPAN - WP(C) No. 31511 of 2003(B) [2007] RD-KL 11196 (25 June 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 31511 of 2003(B)

1. THANKAMANI, W/O. KARAMACKEL KUMARAN,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. SIVADASAN, S/O. VENNEKOTTU KARAPPAN,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.N.SUBRAMANIAM

For Respondent :SRI.C.HARIKUMAR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE

Dated :25/06/2007

O R D E R

PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W.P.(C) No.31511 of 2003
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dated: 25th June, 2007



JUDGMENT

The challenge in this Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution is directed against the orders of temporary injunction passed by the learned Munsiff and confirmed in appeal by the learned District Judge. I have gone through the impugned order/judgment. I do not find any warrant for correcting them in the supervisory jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution. Mr.M.S.Narayanan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that subsequently the suit itself was dismissed by the learned Munsiff for default on the basis that an endorsement was made on the plaint by the counsel to the effect that he is not having any instructions from the plaintiff. The copy of the decree is also made available before me. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that he has been informed subsequently that the suit was restored. I do not propose to go into that controversy. I will only observe that the impugned orders are only interim orders and will not survive beyond the final disposal of the suit. The Writ Petition will stand closed. No costs.

srd PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE

W.P.C.No. - 2 -


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.