Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

AMEER, AGED 23 YEARS,S/O.MUHAMAD versus THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


AMEER, AGED 23 YEARS,S/O.MUHAMAD v. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE - Crl MC No. 2027 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 11215 (26 June 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 2027 of 2007()

1. AMEER, AGED 23 YEARS,S/O.MUHAMAD,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.RAJESH CHAKYAT

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :26/06/2007

O R D E R

R. BASANT, J.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Crl.M.C.No. 2027 of 2007
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dated this the 26th day of June, 2007

O R D E R

The petitioner faces indictment in a prosecution under Section 379 I.P.C. According to the petitioner, he did not receive any notice from the court so far. Reckoning him as absconding, the learned Magistrate has issued coercive process to procure his presence. The petitioner submits that he is absolutely innocent. He has always been willing to appear before the learned Magistrate. He shall appear now. But he apprehends that his application for bail may not be considered by the learned Magistrate on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously. It is in these circumstances prayed that appropriate directions may be issued to release the petitioner on bail on the date of surrender itself.

3. It is certainly for the petitioner to appear before the learned Magistrate and explain to the learned Magistrate the circumstances under which he could not appear before the learned Magistrate. I have no reason to assume that the learned Magistrate would not consider the application for bail to be filed by the petitioner when he surrenders before the learned Magistrate, on merits, in accordance Crl.M.C.No. 2027 of 2007 2 with law and expeditiously. Every court must do the same. No special or specific direction appears to be necessary. Sufficient general directions have already been issued by this Court in the decision in Alice George v. Dy.S.P. of Police (2003 (1) KLT 339).

4. This application is accordingly dismissed. I may however hasten to observe that if the petitioner appears before the learned Magistrate and applies for bail after giving sufficient prior notice to the Prosecutor in charge of the case, the learned Magistrate must proceed to pass orders on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously - on the date of surrender itself. (R. BASANT) Judge tm


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.