Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BINU P.R., PANAM THAYYIL versus THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, INDIAN BANK

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


BINU P.R., PANAM THAYYIL v. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, INDIAN BANK - WP(C) No. 9959 of 2007(I) [2007] RD-KL 11228 (26 June 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 9959 of 2007(I)

1. BINU P.R., PANAM THAYYIL,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, INDIAN BANK,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.K.N.VENUGOPALA PANICKER

For Respondent :SRI.T.K.AJITH KUMAR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

Dated :26/06/2007

O R D E R

S. SIRI JAGAN, J.

W.P.(C)NO. 9959 OF 2007

DATED THIS THE 26th DAY OF JUNE, 2007



JUDGMENT

The petitioner challenges proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act 2002. However, the petitioner now confines his relief for permission to pay off the balance amount in instalments. The learned counsel for the respondent opposes the same. According to the respondent, more than Rs.3,50,000/- (Rupees three lakhs fifty thousand only) is due from the petitioner towards repayment of the loan amounts. The petitioner has not taken any earlier steps to pay off the same, although the petitioner has paid some amounts.

2. Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with the following directions. The petitioner shall pay an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) within one month from today. On payment of Rs.1 lakh, the respondent shall give a statement of accounts to the petitioner. The petitioner shall pay the balance amounts in eight equal monthly instalments starting from 4.9.2007. Subsequent instalments shall be paid on the 1st working day after the 3rd of every W.P.(c)No.9959/07 2 subsequent month. If the petitioner pays Rs.1 lakh and the instalments in time, further proceedings pursuant to impugned notices shall be kept in abeyance. However, if the petitioner commits default in payment of either Rs.1 lakh or any of the instalments as directed above, it would be open to the respondent to continue proceedings as per the impugned notices without having to issue any fresh notice or proceedings in that regard.

S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE

Acd W.P.(c)No.9959/07 3


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.