LAILA SALIM, MUBARAK MANZIL versus SIJO.J. VALLIYADU VEEDU

High Court of Kerala

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

LAILA SALIM, MUBARAK MANZIL v. SIJO.J. VALLIYADU VEEDU - WP(C) No. 10988 of 2005(G) [2007] RD-KL 11264 (26 June 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 10988 of 2005(G)

1. LAILA SALIM, MUBARAK MANZIL,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. SIJO.J. VALLIYADU VEEDU,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SMT.S.MUMTAZ

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE

Dated :26/06/2007

O R D E R

PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J.

W.P.(C) No. 10988 OF 2005

Dated this the 26th day of June, 2007

JUDGMENT

No representation for the petitioner today also. In all probability the petitioner has not complied with the condition which was imposed by this Court on 01.04.2005 for granting stay. The Writ Petition at any rate will stand dismissed for default.

PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE

btt  WPC 2 

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.