Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

FATHIMA @ FATHIMABI versus AVARA HAJI

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


FATHIMA @ FATHIMABI v. AVARA HAJI - WP(C) No. 1640 of 2007(T) [2007] RD-KL 1142 (16 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 1640 of 2007(T)

1. FATHIMA @ FATHIMABI,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. AVARA HAJI,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.K.MUHAMMED SALAHUDHEEN

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR

Dated :16/01/2007

O R D E R

M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J.

W.P.(C)NO.1640 OF 2007

DATED THIS THE 16th DAY OF JANUARY, 2007



JUDGMENT

Petitioner is defendant. Respondent is plaintiff in O.S.166/99 on the file of Sub Court, Ottapalam. Evidence of plaintiff was closed and is posted for defence evidence. Petitioner filed I.A. 20/07, an application under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure to receive the audio cassette produced by petitioner in the suit.

2. The grievance of petitioner was that learned Sub Judge did not pass any order in I.A.20/07.

3. Learned Counsel appearing for petitioner was heard. Learned Sub Judge is directed to pass appropriate order in I.A.20/07 in accordance with law.

M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,JUDGE

Acd


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.