Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SUNIL LAL.P versus THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD.

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SUNIL LAL.P v. THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD. - WP(C) No. 28956 of 2005(V) [2007] RD-KL 11421 (27 June 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 28956 of 2005(V)

1. SUNIL LAL.P,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD.,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.P.ALI

For Respondent :SRI.K.PRABHAKARAN, SC,SOUTH INDIAN BANK

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE

Dated :27/06/2007

O R D E R

PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J.

W.P.(C) No. 28956 OF 2005

Dated this the 27th day of June, 2007



JUDGMENT

In this Writ Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution filed by the judgment debtor, the petitioner impugns Ext.P1 sale proclamation issued by the Subordinate Judges Court, Paravur at the instance of the respondent-decree holder proposing to sell the decree schedule property for a total amount of Rs.17,11,868/-. The ground which is prominently raised in this Writ Petition is that the value of the property proposed to be sold is much more than the decree debt and that it will suffice if a portion of the property is sold. Noticing this contention, this Court granted stay of sale on condition that the petitioner pays to the respondent-Bank a sum of Rs.2,75,000/- within three months fro 14.10.05. Neither side is able to inform me whether the above condition has been complied with. Having regard to the grounds raised, I am of the view that this Writ Petition can be disposed of issuing the following directions: The court below will verify whether the petitioner has complied with the condition imposed by this Court on 14.10.05 that a sum of Rs.2,75,000/- shall be paid by the petitioner within three months from 14.10.05. If it is seen that the above condition has been complied with, WPC No.28956 of 2005 2 then the court below will hold up the execution proceedings for another three months from the day of receiving copy of this judgment. It is open to the petitioner to identify a person to purchase a portion of the decree schedule property in the meanwhile. Once such a purchaser is identified and the 1st respondent Bank is informed of the same, the petitioner will file an application seeking permission of the court to sell the property to the prospective purchaser. The court below will consider that application and pass appropriate orders so as to facilitate discharge of the entire decree debt. At any rate, the order of stay will not continue beyond a period of three months of production of copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.

PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE

btt WPC No.28956 of 2005 3


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.