JSOSSY ABRAHAM, AGED 50 versus ROBIN ABRAHAM, AGED 54

High Court of Kerala

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

JSOSSY ABRAHAM, AGED 50 v. ROBIN ABRAHAM, AGED 54 - CRP No. 575 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 11453 (28 June 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

CRP No. 575 of 2007()

1. JSOSSY ABRAHAM, AGED 50,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. ROBIN ABRAHAM, AGED 54 ,
... Respondent

2. THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER, TRIVANDRUM.

3. BABY JOSEPH,

For Petitioner :SRI.CHITTOOR RAJAMANNAR

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

Dated :28/06/2007

O R D E R

M.N.KRISHNAN, J.

C.R.P.No.575 OF 2007 C

Dated this the 28th June, 2007.

O R D E R

This revision petition is preferred against the order in E.A.69/05 in E.P.31/03 in O.S.95/01 of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Thodupuzha. The petition is filed by the judgment debtor to consider the question as to the jurisdiction of the court to execute the decree on the ground of fraud, grave violations of procedures and other connected matters. I have taken a decision in other C.R.P's, 527/07 and 528/07 to the effect that when a person wants to challenge a decree on the ground of fraud, it is only a voidable decree and it has to be set aside by methods known to law and the execution court can go into that question. So, the said submission cannot be accepted. Now, learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that the decree is not in consonance with the judgment and it is liable to be interfered with. The judgment and decree of the court has been taken up in appeal and it reached up to the Apex Court and it has been confirmed. So what is put into execution is the decree which is confirmed by the Apex Court and the executing court cannot go beyond the terms of the decree and therefore such a question cannot be considered at this stage. For these reasons I  C.R.P. 575/07 2 find no reason to interfere with the decision rendered by the executing court. Therefore C.R.P is dismissed. M.N.KRISHNAN Judge jj 

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.