Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

STATE OF KERALA versus C.K.KUMARAN

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


STATE OF KERALA v. C.K.KUMARAN - WA No. 2159 of 2006 [2007] RD-KL 11500 (28 June 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WA No. 2159 of 2006()

1. STATE OF KERALA,
... Petitioner

2. THE COMMANDANT,

3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,

Vs

1. C.K.KUMARAN,
... Respondent

2. P.SURABMANIAN, MECHANIC GRADE-I,

3. A.MOHANAN,

For Petitioner :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

For Respondent :SRI.V.RAJENDRAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

Dated :28/06/2007

O R D E R

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANTONY DOMINIC, JJ.


===============================
W.A. NO. 2159 OF 2006
======================

Dated this the 28th day of June, 2007



J U D G M E N T

Radhakrishnan, J.

The writ appeal arises out of the judgment in OP No.19144 of 1998. The writ petition was preferred by the respondents herein seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to revise the pay of the petitioners treating them on a par with Executive Technicians and also for a direction to the respondents to revise the pay of the petitioners giving the full benefits granted in Ext.P2 judgment and also for a direction to consider Exts. P4, P5 and P6 representations. Learned Single Judge while disposing the writ petition has stated that fixation of pay has to be given effect to from the date of joining service. Learned Single Judge also opined that what this court intented in Ext.P3 was to grant the scale with effect from the date of entry in service as Civil Technician, limiting the financial benefit from 5.7.92.

2. We are of the view that since the petitioner has already placed his grievances before the Government as per Exts. P4 to WA 2159/2006 P6 representations, it would be appropriate that Government itself would examine the grievance. The Government would pass orders untramelled by the observations contained in the judgments in OP No.19144/98 as well as OP No.12711 of 1992 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Writ appeal is disposed of as above.

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE.

Rp


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.