Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

CORPORATION OF KOCHI versus K.G.BAHULEYAN

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


CORPORATION OF KOCHI v. K.G.BAHULEYAN - RP No. 308 of 2007(L) [2007] RD-KL 11540 (29 June 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

RP No. 308 of 2007(L)

1. CORPORATION OF KOCHI,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. K.G.BAHULEYAN,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN NAIR, SC, COCHIN CORP

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH

Dated :29/06/2007

O R D E R

KURIAN JOSEPH , J


==========================================
C.M. Appln. No. 143/2007 & R.P. NO. 308 OF 2007
===========================================

Dated this the 29th day of June, 2007.



JUDGMENT

This is a petition to condone the delay of 202 days in filing the revision petition. It is seen from the affidavit that no satisfactory explanation has been given for the inordinate delay in filing the petition. True, certain events are narrated, but when exactly the delay occurred is not discernible. Be that as it may, on merits it is seen that this Court had taken note of the fact that the writ petitioner was only an N.M.R. worker and that Ext. P3 notice was issued on the eve of his retirement in 2001 proposing to recover the alleged excess pay drawn by him from 01.04.1990. Inviting reference to the decision of this Court in S anthakumari P.J. v. State of Kerala (2 005(4) ILR 563), it is submitted that the recovery is permissible. I am afraid the contention cannot be appreciated. Even if it is considered on merits also, the contentions cannot be appreciated. The fixation is made in 1990. Steps for recovery are taken in the year 2001. It is a case of an N.M.R worker who never had an opportunity to know about the fixation which is an intricate process. Apart from all these, there is no notice also before the recovery. For all these reasons, there is also no merit in the case either. Accordingly, the petition for condonation of delay is dismissed. Consequently the R.P is also dismissed.

KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE.

rv

KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE.

R.P. NO. 308 of 2007 29th day of June, 2007

JUDGMENT


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.