Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SREEKUMAR, S/O.SUKUMARAN, AGED 30 YEARS versus THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SREEKUMAR, S/O.SUKUMARAN, AGED 30 YEARS v. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE - Bail Appl No. 3975 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 11782 (2 July 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 3975 of 2007()

1. SREEKUMAR, S/O.SUKUMARAN, AGED 30 YEARS,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :02/07/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J.

B.A.No.3975 of 2007

Dated this the 2nd day of July 2007

O R D E R

Application for regular bail. The petitioner was allegedly found to be in possession of 1,155 litres of wash when the excise party reached the scene of crime on 23/4/2007. The petitioner took to his heels and could not be apprehended. He surrendered before the court long later on 12/6/2007. He continues in custody from that date.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner who has been continuing in custody from 12/6/2007 may, now be enlarged on bail. The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the said prayer. The allegations are serious. The magnitude of the operation may be borne in mind. The learned Public Prosecutor makes a further submission that the petitioner is a person who distributes contraband articles in the locality. In these circumstances, the petitioner may not be enlarged on bail now, submits the learned Public Prosecutor. I find merit in the opposition by the learned Public Prosecutor. B.A.No.3975/07 2

3. In the wake of the opposition by the learned Public Prosecutor, regular bail can be granted to the petitioner only if this court is in a position to entertain the twin satisfactions under Section 41A of the Kerala Abkari Act. I do not find any circumstances which can persuade this court to entertain either of those two satisfactions at the moment. I am satisfied that this petition deserves to be dismissed now.

4. In the result, this petition is dismissed. I may hasten to observe that the petitioner shall be at liberty to move this court or the learned Sessions Judge again for bail at later stage of the investigation, not at any rate, prior to 12/7/2007. The investigator shall, in the meantime, make every endeavour to complete the investigation.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge B.A.No.3975/07 3 B.A.No.3975/07 4

R.BASANT, J.

CRL.M.CNo.

ORDER

21ST DAY OF MAY2007


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.