Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BABURAJ, S/O NANDANAN versus THE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


BABURAJ, S/O NANDANAN v. THE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE - Bail Appl No. 4022 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 11968 (4 July 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 4022 of 2007()

1. BABURAJ, S/O NANDANAN,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE,
... Respondent

2. STATE REPRESTNTED BY

For Petitioner :SRI.P.K.ANIL

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :04/07/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J

B.A.No.4022 of 2007

Dated this the 4th day of July, 2007

ORDER

Second application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner faces allegations under the provisions of the Kerala Abkari Act. His earlier application for bail was dismissed by another Bench of this Court holding that the petitioner is not entitled for anticipatory bail and directing him to surrender before the learned Magistrate having jurisdiction. The learned Magistrate was further directed to consider such application for bail in the light of the dictum in Sukumari v. State of Kerala [2001(1) K.L.T 22]. The petitioner did not surrender before the learned Magistrate within the period stipulated. He has come before this Court again with the present application seeking the very same relief.

2. How is this petition maintainable ? What is the change in circumstances ? Evidently and obviously, I cannot sit in judgment over the earlier decision by another Bench. The petitioner has not chosen to challenge the same also. The only other circumstance urged is that there has been passage of time. Except that there has been passage of time, no other circumstance whatsoever is brought to the notice of the Court. I am, in these circumstances, satisfied that this application for anticipatory bail is misconceived. The petitioner B.A.No.4022 of 2007 2 cannot succeed. Needless to say that the petitioner can appear before the Investigating Officer or the learned Magistrate and the petitioner's application for regular bail thereafter must be considered by the learned Magistrate on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously - in the light of the decision in Sukumari v. State of Kerala (supra).

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

rtr/-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.