Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

C.K.LAKSHMI, AGED 44 versus SUVARNA KURIES AND LOANS (P) LTD.

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


C.K.LAKSHMI, AGED 44 v. SUVARNA KURIES AND LOANS (P) LTD. - WP(C) No. 29125 of 2005(P) [2007] RD-KL 11974 (4 July 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 29125 of 2005(P)

1. C.K.LAKSHMI, AGED 44,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. SUVARNA KURIES AND LOANS (P) LTD.,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)

For Respondent :SRI.A.MOHAMED MUSTAQUE

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE

Dated :04/07/2007

O R D E R

PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J.

W.P.(C) No. 29125 OF 2005

Dated this the 4th day of July, 2007



JUDGMENT

The judgment debtor whose properties have been brought to sale by the respondent decree holder in execution of a money decree has filed this Writ Petition under Article 227 complaining that Ext.P2 objections filed by him have not been considered by the execution court. He also urges through the Writ Petition that she is a traditional pappadam maker and therefore her house cannot be attached and sold since she is entitled to get the benefit granted under Section 60 (1) (c) of CPC.

2. Heard Sri.Ravi Pariyarath, counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Sumod counsel for the 4th respondent. As rightly submitted by Mr.Sumod it is not contended in Ext.P2 at all, that the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of Section 60 (1) (c) of the CPC, instead the contention is only that the properties which are now attached and sought to be sold no longer remain the property of the petitioner. That contention, I agree with Mr.Sumod is a contention to be raised by the present owners of the property through proper claim petition under Rule 58 of Order XXI. Obviously, the petitioner is in need of time for paying decree debt. Noticing this fact, this court while admitting this Writ WPC No. 29125 of 2005 2 Petition granted stay on condition that the petitioner shall pay Rs.5,000/- within one month from 17.10.05. Mr.Ravi submits that the above condition was promptly complied with by the petitioner. I accept the above submission and dispose of the Writ Petition issuing the following directions: The order of stay will continue until the court passes an order on a prospective application to be submitted by the petitioner for recording full satisfaction of the decree subject to the following conditions. The petitioner pays every month commencing from 1st of August 2001 at the rate of Rs.4,000/- towards the decree debt till the entire decree debt is discharged. When she feels that the entire decree debt is discharged, it is open to her to file application for recording full satisfaction. The petitioner will forfeit the benefit of this judgment if she defaults payment of any two instalments.

PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE

btt WPC No. 29125 of 2005 3


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.