Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ROHINI, W/O.NARAYANAN, PUTHENVEEDU versus STATE, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


ROHINI, W/O.NARAYANAN, PUTHENVEEDU v. STATE, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC - Bail Appl No. 4078 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 12387 (6 July 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 4078 of 2007()

1. ROHINI, W/O.NARAYANAN, PUTHENVEEDU,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :06/07/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J

B.A.No.4078 of 2007

Dated this the 6th day of July, 2007

ORDER

Application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner, a woman, is the 1st accused. She along with the 2nd accused was allegedly found to keep in their possession and transporting 180 X 150 ml of arrack in packets. They were intercepted and apprehended. Arrest of the 1st accused/petitioner could not be effected as the excise party had no lady official in it. The 2nd accused was arrested. Investigation is in progress. The petitioner apprehends imminent arrest.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent. Her arrest and detention afresh is not necessary now. Anticipatory bail may be granted to her, it is prayed.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the application. There are no circumstances justifying the invocation of the extraordinary equitable discretion under Section 438 Cr.P.C, submits the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. I find merit in the opposition by the learned Public Prosecutor. This is a fit case where the petitioner must resort to the ordinary and normal procedure of appearing before the Investigating Officer or the learned Magistrate having jurisdiction. She must then seek regular bail. B.A.No.4078 of 2007 2

5. This application is, in these circumstances, dismissed, but I may hasten to observe that if the petitioner surrenders before the learned Magistrate and applies for bail after giving sufficient prior notice to the Prosecutor in charge of the case, the learned Magistrate must proceed to pass appropriate orders on merits and expeditiously - on the date of surrender itself.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

rtr/-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.