Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SIMON K.FRANCIS, KUTTIKADAN HOUSE versus THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SIMON K.FRANCIS, KUTTIKADAN HOUSE v. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE - WP(C) No. 20338 of 2007(U) [2007] RD-KL 12403 (6 July 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 20338 of 2007(U)

1. SIMON K.FRANCIS, KUTTIKADAN HOUSE,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
... Respondent

2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

3. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

For Petitioner :SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR

For Respondent :SRI.S.SREEKUMAR, SC FOR CBI

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :06/07/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J

= = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C). No.20338 Of 2007 = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Dated this the 6th day of July, 2007



JUDGMENT

The learned Standing Counsel for the CBI submits that the investigation is complete. The final report is ready and the CBI is only waiting for securing sanction under Section 19 of the P.C Act for prosecuting the accused from the Government. As soon as orders are passed by the Government in the matter, necessary further steps shall be taken, submits the learned Standing Counsel .

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Government may be directed to take appropriate steps. No such direction appears to be necessary at this stage as admittedly request for sanction has gone to the Government only after 25.05.07. The Government should certainly apply its mind and pass orders. No directions are necessary now. In the result, this petition is dismissed after taking note of and recording the submission of the learned Standing Counsel for the CBI. I make it clear that this order does not fetter the right of the petitioner to take appropriate action if orders on the application for sanction is not passed within 3 months from 25.05.07.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

sj /TRUE COPY/

P.A.TO JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.